Skip to content
From WIDENWIDEN Migration ExpertsQualify. Plan. Lodge once.·SponsorTalent·Widen CPD·WIDEN AI·WIDEN LawKeshab Chapagain · MARN 1576536
Latest changeStudent visa reform: onshore 500 applications closed for mostAll changes, dated →

Ready to talk it through? 30 minutes with a registered migration agent — $330 inc. GST, credited if you engage. No form needed. Pick a time →

Skilled visas · Employment references

The employment reference: duties over titles, mapping to the ANZSCO occupation, employers who will not write one, and how the Department verifies

The employment reference is the document on which the skills assessment, the employment points and the sponsored visa’s experience criterion all turn, and most of the references applicants bring are useless: a title, two dates, and a line wishing the employee well. The authorities and the Department assess what the person did, read against the tasks the ANZSCO occupation lists, and a reference that does not describe the duties describes nothing. A job title that does not match the occupation is explained, not changed. An employer who will not write a reference is replaced by a colleague’s declaration and the payroll documents. And the reference is written by someone who will pick up the phone when the Department calls, because it does. This guide sets out what the reference must contain, how duties are mapped without being copied, how mismatched titles and closed employers are handled, the consistency the file needs, and the verification.

By Keshab Chapagain, registered migration agent (MARN 1576536) since 2015 · WIDEN, Sydney · Reviewed October 2026

Book a consultation — $330 inc. GST, creditedSend an enquiry

Keshab Chapagain, registered migration agent MARN 1576536 Keshab Chapagain · MARN 1576536 · Registered since 2015
Assessed on
Duties against the ANZSCO tasks, not the title
Must contain
Letterhead, signatory and position, dates, hours, salary, title as held, duties in detail
Duties
The job as done, in the business’s words; never the ANZSCO list verbatim
Mismatched title
Stated as it was and explained; never changed
No employer
Statutory declaration from a manager or colleague, with payslips, tax and contract
Verification
Calls and emails to the employer; the letter must be true

The migration agent that other migration agents learn from. WIDEN is an OMARA-approved CPD provider — our training is rated ★4.8 by 40+ registered migration agents.

About the CPD →

MARN 1576536

What the reference is for

Three decisions rest on the employment reference. The assessing authority decides whether the applicant's experience is in the nominated occupation at the skilled level, and for many occupations whether there is enough of it. The Department decides, for the points-tested visas, how many months of skilled employment in the occupation or a closely related one the applicant has, in Australia and overseas, in the ten years before invitation. And the Department decides, for an employer-sponsored visa, whether the applicant has the experience the occupation and the stream require. Each decision asks the same question: what did this person actually do, for whom, for how long, for how many hours a week, and was it the work of the occupation. The reference answers it or does not. The skills assessment guide sets out each authority's evidence requirements.

Not ready to book?

Ask one question about your situation

Keshab reads every question and replies personally, usually within one business day, telling you plainly where your case stands and whether a consultation is the right next step.

General information only. Advice on your own case is given in a consultation ($330 inc. GST, credited if you engage).

Duties over titles

ANZSCO classifies occupations by the tasks performed and the skill level required, and the authorities and the Department classify a person's employment the same way: by reading the duties described and asking which occupation's tasks they are. A title is evidence of nothing in itself. Titles vary between employers, countries and decades, inflate and deflate, and are assigned for reasons that have nothing to do with the work; a Senior Consultant may be a salesperson and a Coordinator may be a project manager. A reference that gives the title and the dates and nothing else leaves the reader to guess at the duties, and the reader does not guess, the reader asks for a better reference or declines to count the period. The duties are the substance, and the reference is written to describe them.

What the letter must contain

  • The employer's letterhead, with the business's full name, address, telephone and email, and a registration number where the country has one.
  • The signatory: full name, position, signature, and a direct contact, who is a manager, a director or a human resources officer with authority to confirm the employment.
  • The applicant's full name as in the passport.
  • The dates: the exact start date and the exact end date, or a statement that the employment continues as at the date of the letter.
  • The hours: full-time or part-time, with the hours per week, which the points test needs to see are at least twenty.
  • The salary, with the currency, which the authorities use to judge the skill level and the Department to corroborate the payslips.
  • The position title as held, and any changes of title or promotions with their dates.
  • The duties and responsibilities, in detail, as the next section describes.
  • The date of the letter.

Mapping to the ANZSCO occupation

The ANZSCO entry for each occupation lists the tasks that characterise it, and the reader maps the duties in the reference to them. The applicant's work is to make sure the reference describes the real duties in enough detail that the mapping is obvious: not "responsible for software development" but the languages, the systems, the design and testing work, the deployments, the clients and the team; not "managed projects" but the projects, their scale, the budgets, the schedules, the stakeholders and the reporting. The duties are written in the business's own words, with its products and its vocabulary, because a reference that reproduces the ANZSCO task list verbatim is recognised instantly as written for the assessment, and the authorities' guidance says they discount it and verify it. An applicant who maps the duties to the tasks in their own notes, and then asks the employer to confirm the duties as they were, produces a reference that reads as the employer's and satisfies the mapping.

Duties that straddle two occupations

Many jobs combine the tasks of two ANZSCO occupations: a developer who also manages the project, an accountant who also runs the finance function, a chef who also manages the restaurant. The authority assesses against the occupation nominated, and a reference whose duties are mostly the other occupation's produces an assessment in the other occupation or a negative one. The applicant chooses the occupation whose tasks the duties mostly are, and the reference describes all the duties truthfully, with the ones that belong to the nominated occupation described in the most detail; the reference does not omit the other duties, because the verification call will reveal them, but it describes the job as it was weighted. An applicant whose duties are genuinely half and half obtains advice on which occupation to nominate before the reference is written, because the choice decides the assessment, the list and the points. The negative assessment guide covers what happens when the wrong occupation was chosen.

The mismatched job title

A title that does not match the nominated occupation is stated in the reference exactly as it was held, because the payslips, the contract and the employer's records carry it and a reference that changes it is a false document. The mismatch is then explained: in the reference itself, where the employer is willing to add a sentence that the position titled Technical Lead performed the duties of a software engineer; or in the applicant's covering statement to the authority, which says that the title was the employer's convention and the duties were as described. The reader maps the duties regardless of the title, and an explained mismatch is routine; an unexplained one is a question, and a changed one is a refusal.

When the employer will not write one

Employers close, are acquired, lose their records, adopt policies of confirming dates only, or refuse out of pique, and the authorities and the Department accept alternative evidence where the applicant shows that a reference could not be obtained. The alternative is a statutory declaration, or its equivalent abroad, from a former manager or a senior colleague who worked alongside the applicant and can describe the duties from their own knowledge, giving their own name, position, dates of overlap and contact details, and declaring the duties and the hours; supported by the documents that prove the employment, the contract, the payslips, the tax records, the superannuation or pension statements, the employer's identity documents, and anything else that corroborates the role, an organisational chart, an email signature, a project document. A declaration from a colleague with nothing behind it is weak; a declaration with the payroll documents is accepted in the ordinary course. Where the employer will confirm dates and title but not duties, the letter confirming those is lodged alongside the declaration that supplies the rest.

Self-employment and contracting

A self-employed applicant has no employer to write a reference and writes a statement of their own duties, supported by the business registration, the contracts and invoices, the tax returns showing the business income, the clients' confirmations, and a declaration from an accountant or a major client; a contractor obtains references from the clients or the agency with the contracts and the invoices. The authorities each have their own requirements for the self-employed, and the evidence is assembled to them. The self-employed evidence guide sets them out.

Consistency across the file

The reference lodged with the skills assessment, the resume lodged with it, the employment claimed in the expression of interest, the employment history on Form 80, and the references lodged with the visa application are read against each other, and the dates, titles, hours and duties must match. A reference to the authority that describes the role one way and a reference to the Department that describes it another, or a resume with different dates from the reference, or an expression of interest claiming months the reference does not cover, is an inconsistency that the Department pursues by verification and resolves against the applicant. The references are obtained once, before the assessment, and the same documents are lodged at every stage; a later reference, obtained because the first was inadequate, is consistent with the first in every fact and fuller in the duties. The employment history guide covers the timeline the references sit in.

Verification

The Department verifies employment claims for the points-tested visas as a matter of routine and for sponsored visas where the experience is a criterion, by telephoning or emailing the employer at the contact on the letterhead, by having its overseas posts visit or call, and by comparing the claims with tax and social insurance records where it can obtain them. The call asks whether the applicant worked there, in what position, doing what, for what period and hours, and whether the signatory wrote the reference. An employer who confirms the letter ends the inquiry. An employer who does not recognise the letter, who describes a different role, or who cannot be reached at the contact given, produces a finding that the claim is not proven, a refusal on the points, and, where the letter is found to be false, a refusal under PIC 4020 with its three-year bar. The reference is therefore written by a real person at a real contact who will say the same thing, and the applicant tells the employer that the call may come. The points refusal guide sets out how the refusals read.

Book a consultation — $330 inc. GST, credited

General information only, current at October 2026; not advice on your own case. The definition of skilled employment in regulation 2.26AC and the points test in Schedule 6D to the Migration Regulations 1994, the experience criteria of the employer-sponsored subclasses, Public Interest Criterion 4020, the ANZSCO occupation descriptions, and the employment evidence requirements of each assessing authority, as at the date above. Outcomes depend on the assessing authority’s and the Department’s assessment of each application; no registered migration agent can guarantee a result (Code of Conduct, Migration Agents Regulations). Keshab Chapagain, MARN 1576536.

Not sure which visa fits you?

Answer three questions. An automated guide points you to the route that usually applies. General information only.

WIDEN guide automated

Ask Keshab a question — it costs nothing

Tell Keshab your situation and your question. Keshab reads it personally and replies within a business day. Asking costs nothing. Advice on your own case is the paid consultation.

Read by a registered agent, not a form robot
Asking costs nothing and is confidential — no client relationship is created
Advice follows a written service agreement (s 42 of the Code)

Ready now? Skip the form. Pick a time and talk to Keshab directly — your documents on the table, a straight answer, and a written summary afterwards. $330 inc. GST, credited toward your fee if you engage.

Pick a time — no enquiry needed →

Quicker to say it than type it? Leave a voice message in WIDEN Chat.

Not ready to ask yet? Get our free points calculator worksheet instead

MARN 1576536 · practising since 2015 · replies personally

Questions we get asked first

My job title does not match the occupation I am applying under. Does that matter?

Less than the duties. The assessing authority and the Department classify employment by what the person actually did, read against the tasks the ANZSCO description gives for the occupation; a person titled Business Analyst whose duties were those of a software engineer is assessed as a software engineer, and a person titled Software Engineer whose duties were support and testing is not. The reference states the title as it was, because a title changed to fit the occupation is a false document, and describes the duties as they were, and the mapping is done by the reader. A title that is far from the occupation is explained in a sentence.

What must the reference contain?

The employer's letterhead with address and contact details; the name, position and signature of the person writing it, who must be someone with authority to confirm the employment, a manager or a human resources officer rather than a colleague; the applicant's full name; the exact start and end dates, or that the employment continues; whether full-time or part-time and the hours per week; the salary; the position title as held, with any changes; and the duties and responsibilities in detail, in the words of the business rather than the words of the ANZSCO description. A reference missing the hours, the dates or the duties is a reference the authority asks to have redone.

Should the duties be copied from the ANZSCO description?

No. A reference whose duties are the ANZSCO task list verbatim is read as a reference written for the assessment rather than by the employer, and the authorities say so in their guidance; verification then tests whether the employer actually wrote it. The duties are described as the job was done, in the business's own terms, with the specific systems, products, clients, projects and responsibilities, and the reader maps them to the occupation. The applicant's job is to make sure the real duties are described fully enough that the mapping is obvious.

My old employer has closed, or refuses to write a reference. What then?

The authorities and the Department accept alternative evidence where a reference cannot be obtained: a statutory declaration from a former manager or senior colleague who can speak to the duties, with their own contact details and position, supported by the payslips, the tax records, the employment contract, the superannuation statements, and anything else that corroborates the employment and the role. A declaration alone is weak; a declaration with the documents is accepted. An employer who will confirm only dates and title provides that, and the duties are covered by the declaration and the documents.

Does the Department check?

Yes, routinely for the points-tested visas and for employer-sponsored applications where the experience is a criterion: it telephones or emails the employer, sometimes through its overseas posts, and asks whether the person worked there, in what role, with what duties, for what period, and whether the signatory wrote the reference. An employer who does not recognise the letter, or who describes a different role, ends the application under PIC 4020 as well as on the points. The reference is written by a person who will answer the phone and say the same thing.

What does the consultation cost?

A$330 inc. GST for 30 minutes by video with Keshab Chapagain (MARN 1576536), credited in full if you engage WIDEN. For a reference the session maps your duties to the occupation, says whether the title needs explaining, drafts the content the employer should confirm, and checks the consistency with everything else you will lodge.

Keep reading


Ten years of files.
One agent on yours.

Ask Keshab a question — it costs nothingBook a consultation — $330 inc. GSTIn writing, no call — $550Talk to Keshab

Talk to KeshabAsk — freeBook a time →
Ask Keshab a question — it costs nothing →Pick a time — A$330, credited Talk to Keshab